Last verified: May 2026
The 1890 Wounded Knee Massacre
On December 29, 1890, U.S. 7th Cavalry troops killed approximately 250 Lakota Sioux men, women, and children at Wounded Knee Creek on the Pine Ridge Reservation. The massacre was the culmination of decades of broken treaties (Fort Laramie Treaties of 1851 and 1868), forced reservation confinement, the Ghost Dance religious movement’s suppression, and the U.S. military’s response to perceived Lakota resistance.
The Wounded Knee massacre is widely recognized as the practical end of the Plains Indian Wars and the symbolic end of the open-resistance era of Native American history. The event is foundational to:
- Modern Lakota political identity.
- Federal-tribal relations under the Marshall Trilogy framework.
- 20th-century Native American grievance and reform movements.
The 1973 Wounded Knee Occupation
The American Indian Movement (AIM), led by activists including Russell Means, Dennis Banks, and Carter Camp, occupied the village of Wounded Knee from February 27 through May 8, 1973. The occupation:
- Brought national attention to tribal-government corruption (the Dick Wilson administration of the Oglala Sioux Tribe).
- Highlighted federal failures to honor Fort Laramie treaty obligations.
- Produced 71-day armed standoff with U.S. Marshals, FBI, and Bureau of Indian Affairs personnel.
- Resulted in two AIM members and one federal officer killed.
- Led to lengthy criminal prosecutions of AIM leadership (the "Wounded Knee Trials") that produced controversial outcomes including the dismissal of charges against Means and Banks for prosecutorial misconduct.
Russell Means and the Long Lakota Sovereignty Tradition
Russell Means (1939–2012), Oglala Lakota and AIM leader, became one of the most prominent Native American voices of the 20th century. Means’s long career encompassed:
- Wounded Knee 1973 leadership.
- Repeated tribal-government candidacy (Oglala Sioux Tribe presidency).
- Acting career (The Last of the Mohicans, others).
- Sustained public advocacy for tribal sovereignty.
- Treaty-rights litigation strategy and education.
Means’s posture connected economic self-determination to tribal sovereignty. The 2020 Pine Ridge cannabis-legalization vote — while occurring 8 years after Means’s death — sits within the long-standing framework of tribal economic sovereignty that Means and AIM helped articulate.
The Oglala Sioux Tribe’s 2020 Cannabis Vote
In March 2020, Oglala Sioux tribal members voted to legalize both medical and recreational cannabis on the Pine Ridge Reservation. The vote occurred 8 months before SD’s November 2020 IM 26 / Amendment A vote — making Pine Ridge among the first U.S. tribal nations to authorize comprehensive medical-and-recreational cannabis.
The cannabis-legalization vote occurred against the deeper historical context:
- Long-standing alcohol prohibition on Pine Ridge (more than a century of tribal alcohol-prohibition).
- Treaty-protected sovereignty arguments.
- Economic-development imperatives in one of the poorest counties in the United States.
- Federal-cannabis-policy gradual normalization (post-2014 DOJ Wilkinson Memo era).
The Alex White Plume Hemp Precedent
The Oglala Sioux Tribe’s 2000-era hemp program (under Alex White Plume’s family) is part of the reservation’s cannabis history. White Plume cultivated industrial hemp on Pine Ridge in the early 2000s; federal authorities destroyed those crops and issued restraining orders before the 2018 Farm Bill made hemp federally legal. The White Plume case became a foundational precedent in tribal-sovereignty + federal-cannabis-prohibition jurisprudence and produced lasting documentation of the tension between tribal economic sovereignty and federal Schedule I status.
The Pennington County Sheriff Off-Reservation Posture
The Pennington County Sheriff’s Office told KFF Health News in 2022 it had not arrested anyone for off-reservation possession of cannabis purchased at Pine Ridge dispensaries. The non-enforcement is widely understood as reflecting:
- Sheriff-office discretion to prioritize other enforcement priorities.
- Recognition of historic federal-tribal-state friction at Pine Ridge.
- Practical avoidance of state-tribal litigation.
The non-enforcement is informal and could change with personnel transitions.
The Modern Cannabis Story as Tribal-Sovereignty Continuation
The Pine Ridge cannabis program (No Worries dispensary + 3+ other licensees) and the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe’s Native Nations Cannabis (state’s first medical sale July 1, 2022) operate within the long-standing tribal-sovereignty framework that Wounded Knee 1973, Russell Means, AIM, and Alex White Plume all advanced. The 2020 Pine Ridge cannabis vote and the FSST 2022 launch are concrete economic-sovereignty assertions that connect to a 130+ year history of Lakota resistance to external constraint.
This historical continuity informs the contemporary tribal-state cannabis-policy conversation. SD has not signed cannabis compacts with its tribes (in contrast with WA, MN, and other compact-state models). The absence of compacts produces ongoing friction — a friction that the longer Wounded Knee / AIM / White Plume tradition contextualizes as one chapter in a much deeper sovereignty conversation. See Pine Ridge page. See compact page.
For in-depth cannabis education, dosing guides, safety information, and research summaries, visit our partner site TryCannabis.org
Related on this site: SD Religious Conservatism & Refor..., Sturgis Rally & SD Tourism Economy, Send a Message.